What is good? What is evil? These are
the main questions that come to mind when reading The Strange Case of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. This story follows Dr. Jekyll, a well known and
respected London doctor who develops a drug that enables him to separate his evil,
pleasure-loving self from his upright, respectable self. Throughout the story,
he experiences a double life until his evil side starts to take over. The
battle between good and evil is a reoccurring theme throughout the reading including
instability of self; the effects of repression; and the code of secrecy among
professional men.
Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde represent
good and evil and its ongoing battle with each other. However, Jekyll is not
evil to begin with; he is someone whose pleasures did not line up with the
expectations and restrictions of society. He wanted to keep is “respectable” qualities
separate from his “evil”, “sin-seeking” qualities; thus, creating Mr. Hyde.
“The Late Victorian era was famed
for its outstanding morals and social customs, and was often seen as being a
period of peace and perfection for England. England’s poster city, London, was
said to be the pinnacle of excellence and a place of prosperity, where people
behaved within the boundaries of the highest moral standards” (Mack). However,
this idea of the perfect society was merely a façade. Often, during this time,
people were encouraged to hide their true selves. I believe that Stevenson wanted
to expose these flaws in London’s history by creating the character know as Mr.
Hyde. Hyde represented the imperfections of society and people and the
dualities of human nature that led to London’s repression.
The story of Dr. Jekyll and Mr.
Hyde define male society during the Late Victorian era. Men were expected to embody
“respectable”. This meant that they were to represent sobriety, thrift,
cleanliness and honesty. Often times, men would cover for one another in order
to preserve these ideals. Secrecy played a big role in society and in this story.
The “code of silence” would bind men together in this patriarch.
One example of secrecy comes from
the part in the story where Dr. Lanyon, a doctor and close friend of Jekyll
goes to his death without exposing Jekyll’s secret. Instead, he leaves a letter
for Mr. Utterson, the lawyer that in the event of Jekyll’s death that he would
keep the faith. Another character, Enfield, a cousin and friend of Utterson, directly
avoids any knowledge of others’ secrets. Enfield says: “I feel very strongly
about putting questions; it partakes too much of the style of the day of
judgement. You start a question, and it’s like starting a stone. You sit quietly
on the top of a hill; and away the stone goes, starting others; and presently
some bland old bird (the last thing you would have thought of) is knocked on
the head in his own back garden and the family have to change their name. No,
sir, I make it a rule of mine: the more it looks like Queer Street, the less I ask.”
Mack,
Valerie. Reputation and Social Perfection: The Social Creation of Mr.
Hyde. 2012, pp. 2–3.
https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=gateway
Great post! I also think that this story portrayed the difference between good and evil. Jekyll was trying so hard to keep them seperate (Hyde and himself) but it ended up failing him in the end because Hyde did takeover. The story is also interesting because it shows how powerful evil can be when not taken care of. Jekyll was naive in his thought that he could control his evil side when the two were seperated. -Mackenzie Eckley
ReplyDelete